Living in Novi Sad.

SettleMetric tax engine over official 2026 rules (ZPDG arts. 15a, 33a, 37a, 38, 87-89; ZDOSO arts. 22, 36-44, 52a; lowest contribution base RSD 51,297 per Sl. glasnik RS 112/25; Tax Administration guides of April 2026) ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Jan 1, 2026

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Best eligible scheme = rs-preduzetnik (preduzetnik keeping double-entry books who pays themselves a personal salary at the lowest contribution base) at €60,000 revenue = RSD 7,044,108 (117.4018 RSD per EUR) with 10% deductible expenses (RSD 704,411), profit RSD 6,339,697. Personal salary RSD 51,297 a month = 615,564 a year, gross, including its own levies and deducted as a business expense. Contributions on the salary only: (24% + 10.3% + 0.75%) = 35.05% x 51,297 = 17,979.60 a month = 215,755.18 a year. Income tax on the salary: 10% x (51,297 - 34,221) = 1,707.60 a month = 20,491.20 a year. Income tax on the rest of the profit: 10% x (6,339,697 - 615,564) = 572,413.30. Annual personal income tax (ZPDG art. 87-89) with the 2025 average annual salary of RSD 1,813,032 (3x = 5,439,096; 6x = 10,878,192; personal deduction 40% = 725,213): counted income = 6,339,697 - 215,755.18 - 20,491.20 - 572,413.30 = 5,531,037.32; income for taxation = 5,531,037.32 - 5,439,096 = 91,941.32; the personal deduction is capped at 50% = 45,970.66; taxable 45,970.66 x 10% = 4,597.07 (nil for a taxpayer under 40). Levies = 215,755.18 + 20,491.20 + 572,413.30 + 4,597.07 = 813,256.75 of RSD 7,044,108 = 11.55%, rounded to 11.5 (808,659.68 = 11.48% for a taxpayer under 40). Of this, contributions are 3.1 points (RSD 215,755) and income tax 8.5 points (RSD 597,502).

Notes

The figure is a steady state for a tax resident below pension age: single, no children, no other income, health insurance paid in Serbia, no accounting fees. Why this scheme wins: the other eligible setups cost more at this size. A frilenser (rs-freelancer, norm-cost model 2: 10% tax, 24% PIO and 10.3% health on income after RSD 66,733 a quarter plus 34% of gross) pays RSD 1,941,305 (27.6%); with model 1 it pays RSD 3,584,625 (50.9%); if the freelancer is insured on another basis and owes no health contribution it pays RSD 1,489,941 (21.2%). The DOO with the owner as founder-director and all profit distributed (rs-doo-owner: contributions on the lowest base, 15% profit tax, 15% dividend tax) pays RSD 1,915,149 (27.2%). The paušal scheme (rs-preduzetnik-pausal) is not eligible at this revenue because the turnover limit is RSD 6,000,000 (about €51,100); it would cost RSD 1,158,504 (16.4%), a fixed amount that does not depend on income (RSD 214,300 paušal income a month for NACE 62.01/62.02, the same in Belgrade, Novi Sad and Nis). A keeping-books entrepreneur who pays no personal salary owes 35.05% contributions on the whole profit and would pay between about 30.0% and 40.5% of revenue (RSD 2.11 to 2.86 million) depending on how the contribution base is read, so the salary is the standard choice; the minimum salary buys only minimum pension and health rights. What the figure excludes: accounting fees (double-entry books are compulsory), VAT (€60,000 is below the RSD 8,000,000 limit; above it registration is compulsory, and services to foreign business clients are outside Serbian VAT), advance payments, foreign tax credits and treaties, and any registration fees. The annual income tax uses the 2025 salary thresholds because the 2026 average salary is published only in 2027; the real 2026 thresholds will be higher, so the annual tax of RSD 4,597 will most likely be nil. Fees from one client that meet five of the nine criteria of the test of independence are taxed as other income at 20% plus contributions on the gross amount with no norm costs, which would make this setup much dearer.

EF English Proficiency Index 2025 - Serbia (rank 25/123, score 578, High band) ↗

Research

Data as of

Nov 1, 2025

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Notes

Own band informed by EF EPI 2025 (attribution: EF Education First): Serbia ranks 25th of 123 countries and regions with 578 points, inside EF's High band (550 to 599, per EF's 'About EPI' page), with a green marker of +10 points against the previous score on EF's country page; the global average is 488. By skill: reading 587, listening 574, writing 536, speaking 499. Regions: Vojvodina 587, Southern and Eastern Serbia 554, Sumadija and Western Serbia 520 (the page also lists Kosovo, 565, which is outside this profile). Cities: Belgrade 594, Novi Sad 580. By my count from the 24 names shown on EF's overview page, 20 European countries score above Serbia (Netherlands, Croatia, Austria, Germany, Norway, Portugal, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, Slovakia, Romania, Finland, Poland, Latvia, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungary, Czechia); EF's page does not state Serbia's European position in text. Banded 'high', like Bulgaria (594), Greece (592) and Czechia (582) in this dataset, and above Albania (532) and Moldova (531), which are 'moderate'. Second source (self-reported, not English-specific): Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, Adult Education Survey 2022 (release no. 293 of 31.10.2023, Eurostat method): 87% of respondents aged 18 to 69 say they speak one foreign language, about 60% two and about 42% three or more, and the release says 'most respondents use English, followed by Russian, German, French and Hungarian'; its chart gives English 52.8%, Russian 18.7%, German 5.7%, French 4.3%, Hungarian 1.2% and other 17.3% without naming the base of the 100%. Eurostat's table edat_aes_l21 (ages 25 to 64, 2022) gives 11.9% with no foreign language, 55.8% with one, 25.3% with two and 6.9% with three or more. The release notes that the languages of the peoples of the former Yugoslavia count as foreign languages, so these shares overstate English. Doubt: EF's index is built from adults who took EF's own test (2.2 million in 2025, per EF's overview page), a self-selected group, and speaking is Serbia's weakest skill (499, at the top of EF's Low band); outside Belgrade, Novi Sad and the service sector English cannot be assumed, and the language of public offices (Serbian) was not re-read at an official source for this value. EF's score decides the band.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (RZS) — Household Budget Survey (Anketa o potrošnji domaćinstava) 2025: average monthly individual consumption of households by COICOP group (database table 01010201), converted to one consumption unit (one adult) with the survey's equivalence scale ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Dec 31, 2025

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

RZS publishes no spending figure for one-person households, only household averages, so the construct used is the survey's own one-adult unit: the consumption unit. Inputs. (1) Household Budget Survey 2025, all households, average monthly individual consumption 109,787 RSD per household (RZS database table 01010201 'Personal household consumption, monthly average', Serbia total, last updated 2026-04-09, read 2026-11-03; the twelve COICOP groups add exactly to the total; the same figure is in RZS' statistical release of 9 April 2026). The 2025 survey is already in 2025 prices, so no price uplift is applied. (2) Consumption units: the 2024 final bulletin (Household Budget Survey 2024, Bulletin 724, https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2025/pdfE/G20255724.pdf, Table 6.1) gives 2.03 consumption units per household on the OECD scale the survey applies (head of household 1, every other member aged 14 and over 0.7, child under 14 0.5; 2.57 members per household); the 2023 bulletin has the same 2.03. The 2025 bulletin is not out, so 2.03 is applied to 2025. (3) Rent: the survey has no imputed rent (consumption means expenditure plus the value of own-produced food, drink and firewood), so only actual rent is removed. The 2024 bulletin (Table 3.1) shows 993 RSD of 'actual rentals paid by tenants' and 294 RSD of 'other actual rentals' per household a month (1,287 RSD, 1.3% of spending) inside the housing group; lifted to 2025 with the Serbian HICP for actual rentals (Eurostat prc_hicp_aind, CP041, annual averages 167.7 in 2024 and 178.4 in 2025, x1.0638) it is 1,369 RSD. Arithmetic. 109,787 - 1,369 = 108,418 RSD per household; / 2.03 = 53,408 RSD per consumption unit a month. RSD to USD = amount / 117.4018 RSD per EUR (Eurostat ert_bil_eur_m, September 2026 monthly average of the National Bank of Serbia rate) x 1.1179 USD per EUR (ECB euro reference rate of 2026-11-03): 53,408 / 117.4018 = EUR 454.91; x 1.1179 = USD 508.55, shown as $509. The 12 lines (RZS COICOP groups, housing without rent) are summed in cost-breakdown.

Notes

What the figure is. It is not a measured one-person household: it is the average private household of Serbia (permanent residents; collective households are not covered; Kosovo is not covered) divided by the survey's 2.03 consumption units, that is, what one adult would spend if the household's spending followed the OECD scale. It includes the value of own production (food, drink, firewood), so rural households weigh in, and the food share is high (36.6% of 2025 spending). It is a national average, not a budget for a foreign remote worker in Belgrade: in 2024 Belgrade-region households spent 108,400 RSD a month against 98,165 RSD nationally (+10%) with 2.42 members against 2.57 (2024 bulletin, Table 3.1). Precision. 2024: 6,227 households surveyed (70% of the 8,856 planned); the 95% interval for the 2024 household mean is 96,119 to 100,180 RSD (coefficient of variation about 1%), so sampling error is about 2%; we did not find the 2025 sample size. Why consumption units. The alternatives are per member (109,787 - 1,369 = 108,418 RSD / 2.57 members = $402), which understates one adult because it counts children and spreads shared costs over more people, or a one-person household, which RZS does not publish. A check against observed one-adult households: Eurostat's harmonised Household Budget Survey tables hold Serbian data for the reference years 2015 and 2020 by household type (hbs_exp_t134, hbs_str_t211, hbs_str_t224, hbs_car_t313; updated October 2025). One-adult households (28.8% of households in 2020, a group that includes many pensioners) spent 7,749 PPS a year per household in 2020 and 8,127 in 2015 against 14,285 and 14,355 for all households, but Eurostat's version includes imputed rent (252 per mille of one-adult spending and 161 per mille of all-household spending in 2020, which RZS' national tables do not). Without actual and imputed rent, one-adult households spent 48.2% of the all-household figure in 2020 and 51.3% in 2015, against 1/2.03 = 49.3% under the survey's scale; applied to the 108,418 RSD those shares give $497 (2020) and $529 (2015), about 2% below and 4% above the $509 shown. The ratio is SettleMetric arithmetic on Eurostat's tables, and the 2020 round is not a published RZS result (RZS says its own 2020 survey was interrupted by the pandemic). Other checks. The 2024 survey (98,165 RSD, 1,287 rent, 2.03 units, 2024 prices) gives $454; lifted to 2025 with the Serbian all-items HICP (151.1 to 157.3, x1.041; flagged by Eurostat 'definition differs') it is $473, 7% below the measured 2025 survey, because RZS' household spending rose 11.8% in nominal terms in 2025 (109,787 against 98,165), faster than prices. Removing rent by the 2024 share of the housing group (8.03%) instead of the rental index gives $508. Rent. Serbia is a country of owners (83.2% of households own their dwelling and 4.0% rent a private dwelling, 2024 bulletin, Table 7.1), so the 'excluding rent' label removes only about 1.3% of spending; there is no imputed rent to remove, unlike the German and Dutch entries, whose spending figures carry imputed rent that was removed. Comparability. The German entry is the average of real one-person households (including pensioners) and the Serbian one an equivalised average household, so the two are not like for like; the HICP of Serbia is flagged 'definition differs'. The 2025 values were published on 9 April 2026; the database table carries the status 'A' (normal) for all values and we saw no provisional marking.

RATEL (postal regulator) - Quality of postal services in 2024 and express-service benchmark, with Pošta Srbije, D Express, City Express, AKS Express and BEX Express official pages (composite) ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Nov 3, 2026

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Classified from the regulator's measurements and the carriers' own pages, read on 2026-11-03. RATEL measured the express services of the five operators with more than 1% of the market (AKS Express, BEX Express, City Express, D Express, Post Express of Pošta Srbije) in the last quarter of 2024 and publishes a three-year table (RATEL, 'Quality of postal services in 2024', table 15.14, and the benchmark report of May 2025): average transit time 1.16 days in 2022, 1.26 in 2023 and 1.21 in 2024; items delivered within one day 87.29%, 80.5% and 83.31%; items taking over five days 0.18%, 3.16% and 0.59%; items lost 0.18%, 0.31% and 0.26%; pick-up requests not carried out 15.57%, 35.20% and 24.19%; courier arrival after a pick-up request 3 h 47 min, 4 h 16 min and 4 h 23 min. RATEL itself attributes the weaker 2023 figures to a strike at the national operator in November 2023. Pošta Srbije (national operator): 'close to 1,800 access points and 3,500 delivery districts', more than 1,550 post offices and 6,255 settlements served (its 'Pošta danas' page); its Post Express courier service covers all settlements, takes items at counters in more than 1,100 places, collects at the address in more than 140 settlements for 'Today for tomorrow', offers 'Today for today' in 45 places, and 'Today for now' (as published) in 1,100 places, and 900 parcel machines are available (Pošta news of 25 March 2026, which also reports that Post Express was the best-rated express service in RATEL's 2025 customer survey, with 79.6% of respondents using it). Its parcel-locker site says more than 540 locations for parcels without payment, 154 locations at NIS Petrol and Gazprom stations and 40 outside Lidl stores for parcels with payment, open 24/7, 48 hours to collect (pages published 2025, modified 14 January 2026). D Express: 300 lockers in 80 towns, 24/7, at petrol stations, supermarkets and shopping centres, 2 working days to collect (own pages); 35 parcel shops, 27 delivery depots, about 14 million parcels in 2025, 1,300 staff (Austrian Post release of 21 July 2026); 'Danas za sutra' collects until 17:00 and delivers within 24 h or by 14:00 the next day, 'Dan za dan' same-day delivery between 16:00 and 21:00 inside Belgrade and Novi Sad (own FAQ and service pages); real-time tracking and SMS notices at the parcel shops. City Express: lockers at more than 200 locations (own page). AKS Express: 20 centres with warehouses, 850 staff, lockers with card payment (own pages; locker count loaded dynamically and not read). BEX Express: parcel shops and lockers (counters on its home page are scripts and were not readable), real-time tracking and 'otkupnina (pouzeće)' in its service list. Next-day delivery is the typical result and is sold nationwide, tracking is standard, and three or four locker networks exist side by side; but 17% of items are slower than one day, a quarter of pick-up requests fail in the regulator's test, and the locker counts above are company claims that overlap in unknown ways and were not counted independently, so 'good' rather than 'excellent'.

Notes

Four caveats. (1) The regulator's benchmark samples items from five operators in one quarter; it does not cover all parcels, and 2024 is the latest year published. (2) Locker figures: Pošta 'about 900' (news) against 540 + 154 + 40 on its locker site (the two may not add up the same way), D Express 300, City Express 200+; AKS and BEX counts not read; not added together. (3) Market change: Austrian Post announced on 21 July 2026 that it would buy 100% of D Express and merge it with its subsidiary City Express; City Express's own home page reports the purchase completed on 1 October 2026 (Austrian Post's release says completion was subject to regulatory approval); the two networks are to be merged gradually, so the counts above will change. (4) Access limits: posta.rs answers curl with HTTP 403 on its home page (its news, FAQ, 'Pošta danas' and locker pages were readable), postexpress.rs refused connections, and the Internet Archive refused automated requests (HTTP 429) on 2026-11-03, so Post Express's own service pages were not read; its delivery times come from Pošta's news item and the regulator. Fees, prices and weekend delivery were not assessed.

M-Lab NDT country aggregates for Serbia ↗

Open data

Data as of

Dec 31, 2023

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Median of the 343 daily country-median download values (field download_MED) for RS in 2023 (1,450,318 download tests, the sum of dl_samples_day; daily medians ranged 18.4-32.4 Mbps). With an odd number of days the median is the middle (172nd) value, 26.148 Mbps, shown as 26.15. 2023 is the year used across the dataset (same calculation as the German, Dutch and Austrian entries). The file holds one row per histogram bucket per day; the daily fields are identical across a day's rows, so each day was counted once.

Notes

M-Lab NDT is a single-stream test and reads well below advertised fibre or cable speeds; it is comparable only within this criterion. Monthly medians of the daily values ran from 23.5 Mbps (January) to 28.9 Mbps (September). M-Lab's public file has no values for 22 days of 2023 (29 January to 15 February except 10 February, 24 April, 30 July, 19 November and 30-31 December), so the median covers 343 of 365 days. The same calculation gives 25.2 Mbps for 2022 (353 days, 1,345,809 tests, but daily medians swing from 7.3 to 187.8, a much noisier year); M-Lab's 2024 file for Serbia covers only 86 days (median 29.7 Mbps, 430,506 tests) and there is no 2025 file, so 2023 is the newest full year. We did not check how M-Lab's geolocation treats addresses in Kosovo, so whether the 'RS' aggregate contains any is not confirmed. Context only, a different measure: the regulator RATEL's quarterly market review for Q2 2026 (https://www.ratel.rs/storage/upload/2026/09/Q2-2026-(1).pdf) counts about 2.26 million fixed broadband subscriptions and says the majority of subscribers have contracted access speeds of more than 100 Mbit/s; that is a subscribed speed, not a measured one, so it is not comparable with the M-Lab figure, and the NetTest averages RATEL publishes were not found.

Eurostat — police-recorded intentional homicide (ICCS0101, per 100k), Serbia ↗

Open data

Data as of

Dec 31, 2024

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Notes

2024: 54 police-recorded intentional homicides, 0.82 per 100,000 (Eurostat crim_off_cat, updated 2026-04-29; denominator the 6,605,168 residents on 1 January 2024, Eurostat demo_pjan, Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (RZS) estimates). Serbia is a candidate country and Eurostat holds no 2025 value for it yet. With 6.6 million residents one case moves the rate by about 0.015, so the series is noisy: 2015 1.35 (96 cases), 2016 1.50 (106), 2017 1.12 (79), 2018 1.49 (104), 2019 1.15 (80), 2020 1.10 (76), 2021 1.06 (73), 2022 1.03 (70), 2023 1.17 (78), 2024 0.82 (54); 2024 is the lowest value since the series starts in 2008 (1.74, 128 cases). Attempts are not in the 0.82: Eurostat lists them separately (ICCS0102, 116 cases in 2024 = 1.76 per 100,000). Coverage: not Kosovo. Eurostat's reference metadata for the crime statistics says 'RS: Police, Prosecution and Courts data excludes Region Kosovo and Metohija' (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/crim_sims.htm; Eurostat shows Kosovo as a separate jurisdiction, under UN Security Council Resolution 1244/99), the RZS tables carry the note 'since 1999 without data for AP Kosovo and Metohija', and the denominator excludes Kosovo too (the 2022 census was not conducted there). Cross-checks. (1) RZS database, SDG indicator 16.1.1 'Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population' (source: Ministry of Internal Affairs, data.stat.gov.rs table SDGUN160101, read 2026-11-03): 2015 1.41, 2016 1.64, 2017 1.22, 2018 1.50, 2019 1.27, 2020 1.22, 2021 1.13, 2022 1.11, 2023 1.34, 2024 0.91, and 2025 1.13 (men 1.82, women 0.48; about 74 victims on 6.57 million residents, SettleMetric arithmetic). The ministry's figure is a rate of victims and runs 0.01 to 0.17 above Eurostat's rate of recorded offences in every year (2024: 0.91 against 0.82). We did not find a published reconciliation; counting victims rather than offences is the likely reason (one offence can have several victims), which is our inference, not a statement of either source. The 2025 value is not yet in Eurostat, so the latest national reading is 1.13 (victims, ministry data). (2) Cause-of-death statistics (Eurostat hlth_cd_aro, ICD-10 X85-Y09 'Assault' plus late effects Y87.1, dataset label 'deaths by country of residence and occurrence', category 'all deaths reported in the country', geo RS; read 2026-11-03): 2018 98 deaths, 2019 86, 2020 89, 2021 73, 2022 53, 2023 93, 2024 55 (0.83 per 100,000 on 6,605,168, SettleMetric arithmetic). The 2024 count of 55 deaths is within one of the 54 police-recorded homicides, but the two series differ by up to 17 cases in other years (2022: 53 deaths against 70 offences; 2023: 93 against 78; 2020: 89 against 76), because they count different things: deaths in the calendar year coded to assault as the cause of death against offences recorded by the police in the year. Plausible reasons are that a death can fall in a later year than the offence and that not every assault death is recorded by the police as an intentional homicide, but neither source publishes a reconciliation, so that is our inference. The RZS database itself (data.stat.gov.rs table 18030302) publishes deaths only by ICD-10 chapter (the injuries chapter S00-T98), not by assault, so the assault count comes from the Eurostat release. Recording practices and legal definitions differ between countries, so read the level as context.

Accreditor registries: IB World Schools directory (Internet Archive captures of ibo.org), COBIS member file, AEFE directory, ZfA map of Deutsche Auslandsschulen ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Nov 3, 2026

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Registries read on 2026-11-03: the IB World Schools directory - ibo.org answers our requests with a Cloudflare challenge, so IB profiles were read on Internet Archive captures, dated per school - namely the Serbia finder filtered to Diploma Programme schools (capture of 2025-09-01: 6 schools in Serbia, Deseta gimnazija Mihajlo Pupin, Gimnazija "Svetozar Markovic", Gimnazija Crnjanski, Gymnasium Jovan Jovanovic Zmaj, International School of Belgrade, Rudjer Boskovic School) and the all-programme Serbia finder (capture of 2022-12-02: 7 schools, the same six plus "International School"); the COBIS member file (cobis.org.uk/uploaded/cobis-school-search-map-2025.tsv, last modified 2026-10-21; 354 schools, 3 in Serbia, all in Belgrade); the AEFE directory (aefe.gouv.fr/fr/etablissements; the Serbia group holds one school); the ZfA map of German schools abroad (auslandsschulwesen.de, Deutsche Auslandsschulen world map; the Serbia entry is Belgrade). Street addresses were checked against OpenStreetMap (Nominatim) to confirm the municipality. One count per school; a school with several campuses counts once. City of Novi Sad = 1 school. (1) Gymnasium Jovan Jovanovic Zmaj (Zlatne grede 4, Novi Sad, Stari grad urban municipality; STATE school): IB World School since 2 July 2014, school code 050049, Diploma Programme, English and French (finder row); IB profile capture of 2022-09-28, and listed in the 2025-09-01 Diploma finder. No Novi Sad school is in the COBIS file, the AEFE directory (Serbia group: Belgrade only) or the ZfA map (Serbia entry: Belgrade).

Notes

A verified floor of 1, and the one school is a state gymnasium with an IB Diploma stream (counted, as in the Berlin and Riga entries; without it the figure is 0). The profile page itself dates from 2022-09-28; the school's continued Diploma authorisation rests on the 2025-09-01 finder capture. Guides mention an "International School of Novi Sad" (ISNS) offering Cambridge and IB-style programmes, but it appears in neither the IB finders, the COBIS file, the AEFE directory nor the ZfA map, and Cambridge International's finder renders only in a browser, so it is not counted. The CIS directory was not read (interactive map, direct data call declined) and PYP/MYP-only IB schools authorised after December 2022 would be missed. Schools teaching another country's curriculum for its own nationals were not checked and are not counted.

European Environment Agency — Air Quality Statistics (E1a validated), station RS0029A "Novi Sad-Rumenacka" (Serbian national AQ network, run by the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency) ↗

Open data

Data as of

Dec 31, 2025

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Validated (E1a, verification flag 1) 2025 annual mean at Novi Sad's only PM2.5 station in the EEA set: RS0029A Novi Sad-Rumenacka 17.707 µg/m³ at 98.39% coverage (traffic, urban; 45.2626°N 19.8190°E, 2.2 km from the city-centre point; hourly series from an automatic analyser). Queried from the EEA statistics service on 2026-11-03 (calculated 2026-10-31): Country = Serbia, pollutant PM2.5, ReportingYear 2025, aggregation "Annual mean / 1 calendar year", source flow "E1a/validated data AQ e-Reporting" (11 Serbian PM2.5 stations in all); the EEA City field is empty for Serbian stations, so the station was placed in Novi Sad by name and coordinates.

Notes

ONE station, and a traffic one: Novi Sad has no urban background PM2.5 station in the EEA data, so this reads high relative to where most people live. NETWORK: the state (national) network of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA, network NET-RS002A); the series is hourly (automatic analyser), not a daily gravimetric sample. Beočin-Centar (RS0049A, background, urban, 17.514 µg/m³ at 99.16%, near the cement works) is in the separate municipality of Beočin, 11 km from the centre, and is not counted. 2024, same station: 16.973 µg/m³ at 97.42%. Cross-check: SEPA's annual report "Izveštaj o stanju kvaliteta vazduha 2024" (sepa.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Vazduh2024.pdf, Table 10) gives 17 µg/m³ for Rumenačka and lists five more Novi Sad points from local networks, with 2024 annual means: Neoplanta DOO 23 (gravimetric, 86% coverage), primary school "Đura Jakšić" 17 (gravimetric, 98%), "Novi Sad 2 APV" 15 (gravimetric, 99%), Dečije selo 13 (not marked gravimetric, 90%) and the water utility JKP Vodovod i kanalizacija 12 (gravimetric, 89%); the unweighted mean of all six is 16.2, so the traffic station is not unusually high. Station types of the local points are not given in the report table; those stations are not in the EEA 2025 set. SEPA's 2025 report is not yet published. Above the WHO 2021 guideline of 5 µg/m³; below Serbia's annual limit value of 25 µg/m³ (SEPA report).

National Bank of Serbia, Insurance Sector in Serbia, Second Quarter Report 2026 (voluntary health insurance market); Serbian insurers' own pages (Uniqa, DDOR, Wiener Staedtische, Triglav, Generali, Dunav); PIO Fund and Tax Administration for the public-system contribution ↗

Official source

Data as of

Nov 3, 2026

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Notes

Honest gap on the criterion's figure, with the nearest sourced anchors below. WHY NO NUMBER. The criterion asks for the median of at least three publicly quoted annual premiums for comprehensive private cover (outpatient plus inpatient, about $100k, small deductible) for a healthy 35-year-old. Serbian insurers publish almost no tariffs for such cover. DDOR (packages Bronzani 1 and 2, Srebrni, Zlatni; modules from EUR 1,000 to EUR 100,000), Wiener Staedtische (tiers of EUR 1,000-3,000, EUR 10,000-50,000 and EUR 100,000), Triglav (outpatient EUR 1,000-5,000; outpatient plus inpatient EUR 5,000-100,000), Generali (Total Medic) and Dunav publish product descriptions without prices; Dunav says the premium 'depends on the sum insured, duration, breadth of cover, entry age and other bases'. DDOR's calculator is a form asking for name, telephone and e-mail, Triglav's calculator posts to a server behind a reCAPTCHA, and Wiener asks the visitor to 'request an offer'; none of these was used (personal data or bot checks). Only Uniqa Serbia embeds a tariff table in a public page (dzo.uniqa.rs, calculator by age group, read 2026-11-03). For ages 31-35 it shows EUR 22.56 a month for Vital Start 1,000 (outpatient, EUR 1,000 annual budget), EUR 28.81 for Vital Start 2,000 and EUR 83.43 for Vital Elegant 10,000 (outpatient plus hospital treatment, maternity and delivery, EUR 10,000 annual budget) = EUR 1,001.16 a year = $1,119 for the top package. The page says the prices are informative, apply to people without previously diagnosed chronic conditions, may change after the health questionnaire and are contracted in dinars at the middle rate of the day; its footer carries a 2019 copyright line, so the date of the tariff is unclear, but the EUR 22.56 equals the outpatient component of a Uniqa 'informative offer' dated 30.01.2025 (EUR 30.65 a month = 22.56 + 8.09 for the yearly check-up), so the tariff looks unchanged since January 2025. That is one insurer and an annual limit of EUR 10,000, not the criterion's cover of about $100k, so it cannot stand next to the German $7,335 for unlimited cover; the same reasoning kept Croatia's cheap supplementary product out of its comprehensive figure. MARKET RANGE FROM A BROKER (not an insurer, not an official body). Respect Serbia's page lists monthly premium ranges across insurers for ages 30-39: EUR 13-18 (EUR 1,000 outpatient), EUR 28-38 (EUR 3,000 outpatient) and EUR 58-68 (EUR 50,000 outpatient plus hospital, maternity, check-up, physiotherapy) = EUR 696-816 a year = $778-$912 for the EUR 50,000 package. This is indicative of the market, not a quote, and shows that cover above EUR 50,000 is not priced publicly. Generali's policy for foreigners, which Generali says is needed to regulate a stay in Serbia, has a sum insured of EUR 5,000 and covers only sudden illness and accidents; it is not comprehensive. MARKET CONTEXT. The NBS says voluntary health insurance was 12.8% of all insurance premium in the second quarter of 2026 (RSD 104.3 bn in total), up 11.5% on the same quarter of 2025, with three insurers holding 61.8% of the segment; the statistics give no premium per insured person. WHAT A RESIDENT PAYS INSIDE THE PUBLIC SYSTEM (not this value; already counted elsewhere). Public health insurance with the National Health Insurance Fund is compulsory for employees and for entrepreneurs, who pay the contribution themselves (Welcome to Serbia portal). The health contribution rate is 10.30% (Tax Administration bulletin for the self-employed, English; 5.15% each for employee and employer when wages are paid). Contributions cannot be calculated on a base below the minimum monthly base, which is RSD 51,297 for 2026 (35% of the average wage; the maximum is RSD 732,820; PIO Fund notice of 9 January 2026). A self-employed person who takes no salary therefore pays at least RSD 5,283.59 a month for health = RSD 63,403 a year = EUR 540 = $604, and at most RSD 75,480.46 a month = RSD 905,766 a year = EUR 7,715 = $8,625 at the maximum base. A self-employed person who is also employed by another employer, or retired, is not liable for health contributions when paying personal wages. This health contribution is already one component of the freelancer tax burden in the tax schemes, so it must not be added to a private premium. Private cover in Serbia is a supplement chosen for faster access to private clinics, not a substitute for the compulsory contribution. FOR FOREIGN NATIONALS. DDOR says foreign nationals with temporary residence may take out its voluntary insurance; Wiener says the insured must be a natural person with a registered address in Serbia; Generali says a Serbian-issued voluntary policy is needed for a temporary-residence application (Generali's statement; the Law on Foreigners was not checked). Conversions: RSD 117.4018 per EUR (Eurostat, September 2026 average of the NBS rate) and USD 1.1179 per EUR (ECB, 2026-11-03). NOT READ. Dunav's, Sogaz's, Grawe's and international (IPMI) insurers' prices; Wiener's, DDOR's and Triglav's tariffs behind their quote forms; any insurer price for cover near $100k. If a number is wanted later, the only defensible candidates are the Uniqa figure above (one insurer, EUR 10,000 limit) or the public-system minimum contribution ($604, a different thing).

Law on Digital Assets (Zakon o digitalnoj imovini, RS Official Gazette 153/2020, applied from 29 June 2021) with the National Bank of Serbia digital-assets page and register of virtual-currency service providers; Securities Commission registers; Law on Personal Income Tax Articles 72, 72a, 73, 77, 79a and 95 ↗

Official source

Data as of

Nov 3, 2026

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Notes

Holding, buying, selling and cashing out cryptocurrency are legal for private persons in Serbia, under a dedicated licensing regime. REGULATION. The Law on Digital Assets (Zakon o digitalnoj imovini, RS Official Gazette No 153/2020) entered into force on 29 December 2020 and has applied since 29 June 2021 (Article 146; read in the Ministry of Finance's English translation, https://www.mfin.gov.rs//upload/media/A21I5r_62d6601427e70.pdf). The National Bank of Serbia (NBS) still cites this single gazette number on its digital-assets page on 2026-11-03 and names no amending act. Supervision is split (Article 10): the NBS is competent for virtual currencies (assets 'not issued or guaranteed by a central bank or public authority', for example bitcoin), the Securities Commission for digital tokens and for digital assets that are financial instruments, and a hybrid asset is divided by its features. A company providing digital-asset services (the nine services of Article 3: order execution, buying and selling for money, swaps between assets, custody, issuing and placing, pledge registers, acceptance and transfer of payments, portfolio management, trading platforms) needs a licence from the supervisory authority (Article 4), must have the legal form of a company (Article 52) and must hold minimum capital of EUR 20,000, 50,000 or 125,000 depending on the service (Article 54). The NBS register of virtual-currency service providers lists three licensed firms on 2026-11-03 (VESCON DOO, MCM 965 D.O.O., AX CRYPTO DOO; register numbers 500, 505, 510). The Securities Commission's register of digital-token service providers lists the same three (licences of 17.03.2023 for two and 29.05.2025 for the third) and its register of approved white papers lists 16 decisions from 26.05.2022 to 12.10.2026 (14 white papers and 2 supplements, token offerings by Serbian companies). The NBS states that providing virtual-currency services without its licence 'is prohibited under the Law on Digital Assets and considered a criminal offence under the Criminal Code'; Article 131(4)-(5) lets the supervisor ban the activity and fine a natural person who provides services without a licence RSD 30,000 to 2,000,000. WHAT THE LAW LEAVES TO INDIVIDUALS. Nothing in the law restricts who may acquire or hold digital assets: OTC trading is allowed and the parties 'are not required to use the services of any digital asset service provider' (Article 36); mining is allowed and miners may sell through a provider or OTC (Article 6); secondary trading in assets issued abroad is allowed (Article 31). LIMITS THAT TOUCH INDIVIDUALS OR THEIR BANKING. (1) In retail trade a seller may accept digital assets for goods or services only through a licensed acceptance-and-transfer provider that converts them into money; acceptance or transfer 'directly from a consumer to a trader is not allowed' (Article 97). (2) Banks, insurers, payment institutions and e-money institutions supervised by the NBS may not own digital assets or be providers or users of digital-asset services, except that banks may keep cryptographic keys (Article 13); this binds the institutions, not their customers. (3) Virtual currency cannot be contributed to a company as capital in kind and must be converted into money first (Article 14(1)). (4) Legal persons and entrepreneurs (not natural persons) that acquire virtual currency without using a licensed provider must report the holding to the NBS's Records of Virtual Currency Holders (Article 85(3); NBS notice). (5) Dinar and foreign-currency payments linked to digital-asset deals follow the payment-services and foreign-exchange rules (Article 12). (6) Licensed providers are anti-money-laundering obliged entities; simplified identification applies only below RSD 15,000 per transaction and RSD 40,000 a month or RSD 120,000 a year (AML/CFT Law Article 16a, English consolidation to Official Gazette 19/2025, hosted by the Administration for the Prevention of Money Laundering). TAX CONTEXT, not a criterion input. Law on Personal Income Tax, official English translation on purs.gov.rs (consolidated to Official Gazette 19/2025, in effect 14.03.2025): the transfer of digital assets is a capital gain (Article 72(1)(6)) taxed at 15% (Article 77) on the difference between the selling price and the documented acquisition cost (Article 74); an exchange of one right for another is priced at the market price of the right given (Article 73(3)), so a swap of one crypto-asset for another is a taxable transfer; mined assets that were taxed as other income under Article 85(1)(16) take that tax base as their acquisition cost (Article 74); gains on assets owned continuously for at least ten years are not capital gains (Article 72a(1)(5)); a capital loss can be offset against gains for five years (Article 78); if the sale proceeds are invested within 90 days in the share capital of a Serbian company or a Serbian-based investment fund, 50% of the tax is exempt, or 50% is refunded if invested within 12 months (Article 79a); the return is due within 120 days after the end of the quarter of the transfer (Article 95(2); the Tax Administration's news item also names form PPDG-3R). The Serbian consolidated text valid from 01.01.2026 is listed to Official Gazette 109/25, which amended Articles 15, 21, 89, 95 and 98 (Articles 72, 72a and 79a are not among them), and the Tax Administration's law page lists a later act, Official Gazette 80/26, which was not read, so the Article 95 deadline and any 2026 change are unconfirmed. CLASSIFICATION. Banded 'legal-regulated': holding, trading, mining, OTC dealing and cashing out are lawful and a working licence regime exists, but the only tax relief for private holders is a ten-year holding exemption (not the favourable one-year or time-test logic that put Germany, Portugal and Czechia in 'legal-friendly'), crypto-to-crypto swaps are taxable, and retail payment in crypto must pass through a licensed intermediary. Not 'restricted' (as Moldova, where no authorisation framework exists and paying in crypto is not permitted): a licensed route for payments exists and nothing in the law bars individuals from holding, trading or cashing out. Same band as Albania, Montenegro and Croatia in this dataset. NOT READ OR DOUBTFUL. The NBS and Securities Commission secondary legislation under the law; any NBS statement on residents using foreign exchanges that hold no Serbian licence (the prohibitions in the law target providers, and the NBS warns the public about unlicensed providers); whether Serbian banks in practice refuse crypto-related transfers; Official Gazette 80/26. The Serbian original on nbs.rs has an unreadable text layer, so the English translation was used. A stricter reading of Articles 13 and 97 would give 'restricted'.

Composite - Law on Foreign Exchange Operations (Zakon o deviznom poslovanju, RS Official Gazette 62/2006 ... 30/2018, 19/2025) with the NBS Decision on terms under which residents may hold foreign exchange in bank accounts abroad, the NBS decisions on foreign payments and on personal and physical transfers, Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering Article 46, and Customs Administration cash-declaration rules ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Nov 3, 2026

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Composite, each input read at its source on 2026-11-03. Serbia is outside the EU and keeps a foreign-exchange law. (1) Convertibility and regime. Payments and transfers for current transactions between residents and non-residents 'shall be executed freely' (Law on Foreign Exchange Operations, Article 3) and capital transactions 'freely, unless stipulated otherwise' (Article 10; English consolidation to 30/2018 hosted by the Ministry of Finance, https://www.mfin.gov.rs//upload/media/KamiGh_62d6602ea0f3f.pdf). The NBS says it pursues 'a managed floating exchange rate regime' (NBS monetary-policy page). Residency (Article 2): a foreign citizen is a non-resident in the first year of stay and a resident after more than a year on a residence permit or work visa (also in the NBS guide for returnees and on the Welcome to Serbia portal). (2) Accounts abroad. Article 27 lets residents keep foreign exchange on accounts abroad only 'under the terms and conditions prescribed by the National Bank of Serbia'. The NBS Decision (Official Gazette 31/2012 ... 67/2023 and 13/2025, English text on nbs.rs) names who may do so without approval, among them foreign nationals who have resided in Serbia on a residence permit or work visa for over one year (point 2(6)), dual nationals domiciled in Serbia and Serbian nationals allowed to stay abroad up to one year (point 2(8)), emigrants and persons on professional training abroad, and lists cases that need an NBS decision (for example buying securities where the foreign market requires a local account, medical treatment abroad, construction works; point 3). When the ground ends the funds must be brought back and the account closed within 30 days. A resident who is only a Serbian national therefore cannot freely keep an account abroad; a foreigner who has passed the first year can. (3) Payments and transfers abroad. International payments go through a bank, payment institution, e-money issuer or the post, and a resident gives the bank the document that proves the payment obligation, unless bank and client agree in writing otherwise (the client then keeps the document for ten years) (NBS Decision on foreign payment transactions, 24/2007 ... 111/2015 and 13/2025). A resident natural person may transfer abroad through a bank up to EUR 10,000 a month as gifts, help to family or inheritance, more against documents (NBS Decision on personal and physical transfers, 67/2006, 52/2008, 18/2009, still listed by the NBS). A non-resident may receive any amount from abroad and send funds abroad, but from a non-resident account only after proving that tax obligations to Serbia are settled (Article 29; Welcome to Serbia portal); transfers from a non-resident savings account carry no such condition. (4) Investments abroad. Residents may buy equity securities abroad and real estate abroad freely, long-term debt of EU and OECD issuers, and other debt according to an NBS rating rule; foreign investment funds only through resident fund managers; short-term securities of EU issuers (Articles 11-17; NBS guide for returnees). (5) Domestic currency. Payments and transfers between residents, and in Serbia, must be made in dinars, with listed exceptions; contracts may be written in foreign currency but are paid in dinars (Article 34). (6) Cash between persons. Since Official Gazette 94/2024 a person selling goods, real estate or services may not accept cash of EUR 10,000 or more in dinar equivalent (single or linked payments, or contracts within one year); the sum 'must be paid using a bank account', and a natural person receiving cash on a loan or a real-estate sale contract is bound by the same limit (AML/CFT Law Article 46, English consolidation to 19/2025 on apml.gov.rs); obliged entities report cash transactions of EUR 15,000 or more (Article 47). I found no cash cap between private persons and no other cap on cash between businesses. (7) Cash across the border. Every natural person must declare physically portable means of payment of EUR 10,000 or more on entering or leaving. Foreigners arriving may bring unlimited foreign cash, get a customs certificate for the declared sum and take out up to EUR 10,000 (more only against that certificate or a bank withdrawal confirmation); foreigners living and working in Serbia for over a year may take out up to EUR 10,000; resident Serbian nationals may take out foreign currency of EUR 10,000 or more 'only on the basis of proof of emigration'; dinars only up to the EUR 10,000 equivalent per person (carina.rs pages updated 13-18 March 2026). (8) Banking access for foreigners. A non-resident natural person can open dinar and foreign-currency accounts with a passport and a document showing the place of residence during the last year; the bank applies AML due diligence and 'freely decides on the choice of clients' (Law on Banks Article 41(3)), but may not refuse on discriminatory grounds such as citizenship (Welcome to Serbia portal). Classified 'moderate': current-account convertibility, free capital transactions by default, no limit on what non-residents receive or send, no cash cap between private persons, and a foreigner can keep a foreign account once resident; but the state keeps controls that EU members do not have: document-backed foreign payments, an EUR 10,000 monthly personal-transfer limit, accounts abroad only for listed residents, dinar-only settlement at home, an EUR 10,000 cash limit for sellers and a cash-export limit for Serbian residents. Albania and Moldova are also 'moderate'. A stricter reading ('high') is defensible for a Serbian-national resident, who may not hold an account abroad.

Notes

WHAT WAS NOT READ OR IS DOUBTFUL. (a) The law was amended by Official Gazette 19/2025 (in force 14 March 2025; the NBS Serbian consolidated text cites it). Media and legal publishers describe the amendment as being about authorised exchange offices (register kept by the NBS, suspensions, fines); its text was not read because the Serbian consolidation on nbs.rs has an unreadable text layer, so the Ministry of Finance's English consolidation (to 30/2018) was used for the articles quoted; article numbers 26-29 match in the Serbian text. (b) The IMF's exchange-system classification and Article VIII status are not cited: imf.org answered HTTP 403 and elibrary.imf.org returned an empty body, so no IMF page was read. (c) Not checked: Serbian tax reporting of foreign accounts and CRS exchange, the NBS decision on opening foreign-exchange accounts in detail, the 2011 NBS rule on documents for large cash withdrawals, and banks' practice when foreign inflows exceed the AML thresholds. (d) The Welcome to Serbia portal says foreigners who become residents may keep accounts 'in the country of which they are citizens'; the NBS decision text names no such limit for foreign nationals, but the NBS's own FAQ reads the dual-national and Serbian-abroad cases as limited to the country that issued the passport or residence document, so a similar reading may be applied to foreigners. (e) Payment cards: the guide for returnees says payments abroad by card need a supporting document such as an invoice or a hotel booking page, which banks in practice handle automatically; this was not tested. (f) The NBS FAQ on foreign-exchange rules, the NBS returnee guide (October 2019) and the Welcome to Serbia pages are explanatory; the legal text is in the law and the decisions named above.

SettleMetric tax engine over official 2026 rules (ZPDG arts. 15a, 33a, 37a, 38, 87-89; ZDOSO arts. 22, 36-44, 52a; lowest contribution base RSD 51,297 per Sl. glasnik RS 112/25; Tax Administration guides of April 2026) ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Jan 1, 2026

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Best eligible scheme = rs-preduzetnik (preduzetnik keeping double-entry books who pays themselves a personal salary at the lowest contribution base) at €60,000 revenue = RSD 7,044,108 (117.4018 RSD per EUR) with 10% deductible expenses (RSD 704,411), profit RSD 6,339,697. Personal salary RSD 51,297 a month = 615,564 a year, gross, including its own levies and deducted as a business expense. Contributions on the salary only: (24% + 10.3% + 0.75%) = 35.05% x 51,297 = 17,979.60 a month = 215,755.18 a year. Income tax on the salary: 10% x (51,297 - 34,221) = 1,707.60 a month = 20,491.20 a year. Income tax on the rest of the profit: 10% x (6,339,697 - 615,564) = 572,413.30. Annual personal income tax (ZPDG art. 87-89) with the 2025 average annual salary of RSD 1,813,032 (3x = 5,439,096; 6x = 10,878,192; personal deduction 40% = 725,213): counted income = 6,339,697 - 215,755.18 - 20,491.20 - 572,413.30 = 5,531,037.32; income for taxation = 5,531,037.32 - 5,439,096 = 91,941.32; the personal deduction is capped at 50% = 45,970.66; taxable 45,970.66 x 10% = 4,597.07 (nil for a taxpayer under 40). Levies = 215,755.18 + 20,491.20 + 572,413.30 + 4,597.07 = 813,256.75 of RSD 7,044,108 = 11.55%, rounded to 11.5 (808,659.68 = 11.48% for a taxpayer under 40). Of this, contributions are 3.1 points (RSD 215,755) and income tax 8.5 points (RSD 597,502).

Notes

The figure is a steady state for a tax resident below pension age: single, no children, no other income, health insurance paid in Serbia, no accounting fees. Why this scheme wins: the other eligible setups cost more at this size. A frilenser (rs-freelancer, norm-cost model 2: 10% tax, 24% PIO and 10.3% health on income after RSD 66,733 a quarter plus 34% of gross) pays RSD 1,941,305 (27.6%); with model 1 it pays RSD 3,584,625 (50.9%); if the freelancer is insured on another basis and owes no health contribution it pays RSD 1,489,941 (21.2%). The DOO with the owner as founder-director and all profit distributed (rs-doo-owner: contributions on the lowest base, 15% profit tax, 15% dividend tax) pays RSD 1,915,149 (27.2%). The paušal scheme (rs-preduzetnik-pausal) is not eligible at this revenue because the turnover limit is RSD 6,000,000 (about €51,100); it would cost RSD 1,158,504 (16.4%), a fixed amount that does not depend on income (RSD 214,300 paušal income a month for NACE 62.01/62.02, the same in Belgrade, Novi Sad and Nis). A keeping-books entrepreneur who pays no personal salary owes 35.05% contributions on the whole profit and would pay between about 30.0% and 40.5% of revenue (RSD 2.11 to 2.86 million) depending on how the contribution base is read, so the salary is the standard choice; the minimum salary buys only minimum pension and health rights. What the figure excludes: accounting fees (double-entry books are compulsory), VAT (€60,000 is below the RSD 8,000,000 limit; above it registration is compulsory, and services to foreign business clients are outside Serbian VAT), advance payments, foreign tax credits and treaties, and any registration fees. The annual income tax uses the 2025 salary thresholds because the 2026 average salary is published only in 2027; the real 2026 thresholds will be higher, so the annual tax of RSD 4,597 will most likely be nil. Fees from one client that meet five of the nine criteria of the test of independence are taxed as other income at 20% plus contributions on the gross amount with no norm costs, which would make this setup much dearer.

Eurostat — police-recorded intentional homicide (ICCS0101, per 100k), Serbia ↗

Open data

Data as of

Dec 31, 2024

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Notes

2024: 54 police-recorded intentional homicides, 0.82 per 100,000 (Eurostat crim_off_cat, updated 2026-04-29; denominator the 6,605,168 residents on 1 January 2024, Eurostat demo_pjan, Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (RZS) estimates). Serbia is a candidate country and Eurostat holds no 2025 value for it yet. With 6.6 million residents one case moves the rate by about 0.015, so the series is noisy: 2015 1.35 (96 cases), 2016 1.50 (106), 2017 1.12 (79), 2018 1.49 (104), 2019 1.15 (80), 2020 1.10 (76), 2021 1.06 (73), 2022 1.03 (70), 2023 1.17 (78), 2024 0.82 (54); 2024 is the lowest value since the series starts in 2008 (1.74, 128 cases). Attempts are not in the 0.82: Eurostat lists them separately (ICCS0102, 116 cases in 2024 = 1.76 per 100,000). Coverage: not Kosovo. Eurostat's reference metadata for the crime statistics says 'RS: Police, Prosecution and Courts data excludes Region Kosovo and Metohija' (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/crim_sims.htm; Eurostat shows Kosovo as a separate jurisdiction, under UN Security Council Resolution 1244/99), the RZS tables carry the note 'since 1999 without data for AP Kosovo and Metohija', and the denominator excludes Kosovo too (the 2022 census was not conducted there). Cross-checks. (1) RZS database, SDG indicator 16.1.1 'Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population' (source: Ministry of Internal Affairs, data.stat.gov.rs table SDGUN160101, read 2026-11-03): 2015 1.41, 2016 1.64, 2017 1.22, 2018 1.50, 2019 1.27, 2020 1.22, 2021 1.13, 2022 1.11, 2023 1.34, 2024 0.91, and 2025 1.13 (men 1.82, women 0.48; about 74 victims on 6.57 million residents, SettleMetric arithmetic). The ministry's figure is a rate of victims and runs 0.01 to 0.17 above Eurostat's rate of recorded offences in every year (2024: 0.91 against 0.82). We did not find a published reconciliation; counting victims rather than offences is the likely reason (one offence can have several victims), which is our inference, not a statement of either source. The 2025 value is not yet in Eurostat, so the latest national reading is 1.13 (victims, ministry data). (2) Cause-of-death statistics (Eurostat hlth_cd_aro, ICD-10 X85-Y09 'Assault' plus late effects Y87.1, dataset label 'deaths by country of residence and occurrence', category 'all deaths reported in the country', geo RS; read 2026-11-03): 2018 98 deaths, 2019 86, 2020 89, 2021 73, 2022 53, 2023 93, 2024 55 (0.83 per 100,000 on 6,605,168, SettleMetric arithmetic). The 2024 count of 55 deaths is within one of the 54 police-recorded homicides, but the two series differ by up to 17 cases in other years (2022: 53 deaths against 70 offences; 2023: 93 against 78; 2020: 89 against 76), because they count different things: deaths in the calendar year coded to assault as the cause of death against offences recorded by the police in the year. Plausible reasons are that a death can fall in a later year than the offence and that not every assault death is recorded by the police as an intentional homicide, but neither source publishes a reconciliation, so that is our inference. The RZS database itself (data.stat.gov.rs table 18030302) publishes deaths only by ICD-10 chapter (the injuries chapter S00-T98), not by assault, so the assault count comes from the Eurostat release. Recording practices and legal definitions differ between countries, so read the level as context.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (RZS) — Household Budget Survey (Anketa o potrošnji domaćinstava) 2025: average monthly individual consumption of households by COICOP group (database table 01010201), converted to one consumption unit (one adult) with the survey's equivalence scale ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Dec 31, 2025

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

RZS publishes no spending figure for one-person households, only household averages, so the construct used is the survey's own one-adult unit: the consumption unit. Inputs. (1) Household Budget Survey 2025, all households, average monthly individual consumption 109,787 RSD per household (RZS database table 01010201 'Personal household consumption, monthly average', Serbia total, last updated 2026-04-09, read 2026-11-03; the twelve COICOP groups add exactly to the total; the same figure is in RZS' statistical release of 9 April 2026). The 2025 survey is already in 2025 prices, so no price uplift is applied. (2) Consumption units: the 2024 final bulletin (Household Budget Survey 2024, Bulletin 724, https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2025/pdfE/G20255724.pdf, Table 6.1) gives 2.03 consumption units per household on the OECD scale the survey applies (head of household 1, every other member aged 14 and over 0.7, child under 14 0.5; 2.57 members per household); the 2023 bulletin has the same 2.03. The 2025 bulletin is not out, so 2.03 is applied to 2025. (3) Rent: the survey has no imputed rent (consumption means expenditure plus the value of own-produced food, drink and firewood), so only actual rent is removed. The 2024 bulletin (Table 3.1) shows 993 RSD of 'actual rentals paid by tenants' and 294 RSD of 'other actual rentals' per household a month (1,287 RSD, 1.3% of spending) inside the housing group; lifted to 2025 with the Serbian HICP for actual rentals (Eurostat prc_hicp_aind, CP041, annual averages 167.7 in 2024 and 178.4 in 2025, x1.0638) it is 1,369 RSD. Arithmetic. 109,787 - 1,369 = 108,418 RSD per household; / 2.03 = 53,408 RSD per consumption unit a month. RSD to USD = amount / 117.4018 RSD per EUR (Eurostat ert_bil_eur_m, September 2026 monthly average of the National Bank of Serbia rate) x 1.1179 USD per EUR (ECB euro reference rate of 2026-11-03): 53,408 / 117.4018 = EUR 454.91; x 1.1179 = USD 508.55, shown as $509. The 12 lines (RZS COICOP groups, housing without rent) are summed in cost-breakdown.

Notes

What the figure is. It is not a measured one-person household: it is the average private household of Serbia (permanent residents; collective households are not covered; Kosovo is not covered) divided by the survey's 2.03 consumption units, that is, what one adult would spend if the household's spending followed the OECD scale. It includes the value of own production (food, drink, firewood), so rural households weigh in, and the food share is high (36.6% of 2025 spending). It is a national average, not a budget for a foreign remote worker in Belgrade: in 2024 Belgrade-region households spent 108,400 RSD a month against 98,165 RSD nationally (+10%) with 2.42 members against 2.57 (2024 bulletin, Table 3.1). Precision. 2024: 6,227 households surveyed (70% of the 8,856 planned); the 95% interval for the 2024 household mean is 96,119 to 100,180 RSD (coefficient of variation about 1%), so sampling error is about 2%; we did not find the 2025 sample size. Why consumption units. The alternatives are per member (109,787 - 1,369 = 108,418 RSD / 2.57 members = $402), which understates one adult because it counts children and spreads shared costs over more people, or a one-person household, which RZS does not publish. A check against observed one-adult households: Eurostat's harmonised Household Budget Survey tables hold Serbian data for the reference years 2015 and 2020 by household type (hbs_exp_t134, hbs_str_t211, hbs_str_t224, hbs_car_t313; updated October 2025). One-adult households (28.8% of households in 2020, a group that includes many pensioners) spent 7,749 PPS a year per household in 2020 and 8,127 in 2015 against 14,285 and 14,355 for all households, but Eurostat's version includes imputed rent (252 per mille of one-adult spending and 161 per mille of all-household spending in 2020, which RZS' national tables do not). Without actual and imputed rent, one-adult households spent 48.2% of the all-household figure in 2020 and 51.3% in 2015, against 1/2.03 = 49.3% under the survey's scale; applied to the 108,418 RSD those shares give $497 (2020) and $529 (2015), about 2% below and 4% above the $509 shown. The ratio is SettleMetric arithmetic on Eurostat's tables, and the 2020 round is not a published RZS result (RZS says its own 2020 survey was interrupted by the pandemic). Other checks. The 2024 survey (98,165 RSD, 1,287 rent, 2.03 units, 2024 prices) gives $454; lifted to 2025 with the Serbian all-items HICP (151.1 to 157.3, x1.041; flagged by Eurostat 'definition differs') it is $473, 7% below the measured 2025 survey, because RZS' household spending rose 11.8% in nominal terms in 2025 (109,787 against 98,165), faster than prices. Removing rent by the 2024 share of the housing group (8.03%) instead of the rental index gives $508. Rent. Serbia is a country of owners (83.2% of households own their dwelling and 4.0% rent a private dwelling, 2024 bulletin, Table 7.1), so the 'excluding rent' label removes only about 1.3% of spending; there is no imputed rent to remove, unlike the German and Dutch entries, whose spending figures carry imputed rent that was removed. Comparability. The German entry is the average of real one-person households (including pensioners) and the Serbian one an equivalised average household, so the two are not like for like; the HICP of Serbia is flagged 'definition differs'. The 2025 values were published on 9 April 2026; the database table carries the status 'A' (normal) for all values and we saw no provisional marking.

European Environment Agency — Air Quality Statistics (E1a validated), station RS0029A "Novi Sad-Rumenacka" (Serbian national AQ network, run by the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency) ↗

Open data

Data as of

Dec 31, 2025

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Validated (E1a, verification flag 1) 2025 annual mean at Novi Sad's only PM2.5 station in the EEA set: RS0029A Novi Sad-Rumenacka 17.707 µg/m³ at 98.39% coverage (traffic, urban; 45.2626°N 19.8190°E, 2.2 km from the city-centre point; hourly series from an automatic analyser). Queried from the EEA statistics service on 2026-11-03 (calculated 2026-10-31): Country = Serbia, pollutant PM2.5, ReportingYear 2025, aggregation "Annual mean / 1 calendar year", source flow "E1a/validated data AQ e-Reporting" (11 Serbian PM2.5 stations in all); the EEA City field is empty for Serbian stations, so the station was placed in Novi Sad by name and coordinates.

Notes

ONE station, and a traffic one: Novi Sad has no urban background PM2.5 station in the EEA data, so this reads high relative to where most people live. NETWORK: the state (national) network of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA, network NET-RS002A); the series is hourly (automatic analyser), not a daily gravimetric sample. Beočin-Centar (RS0049A, background, urban, 17.514 µg/m³ at 99.16%, near the cement works) is in the separate municipality of Beočin, 11 km from the centre, and is not counted. 2024, same station: 16.973 µg/m³ at 97.42%. Cross-check: SEPA's annual report "Izveštaj o stanju kvaliteta vazduha 2024" (sepa.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Vazduh2024.pdf, Table 10) gives 17 µg/m³ for Rumenačka and lists five more Novi Sad points from local networks, with 2024 annual means: Neoplanta DOO 23 (gravimetric, 86% coverage), primary school "Đura Jakšić" 17 (gravimetric, 98%), "Novi Sad 2 APV" 15 (gravimetric, 99%), Dečije selo 13 (not marked gravimetric, 90%) and the water utility JKP Vodovod i kanalizacija 12 (gravimetric, 89%); the unweighted mean of all six is 16.2, so the traffic station is not unusually high. Station types of the local points are not given in the report table; those stations are not in the EEA 2025 set. SEPA's 2025 report is not yet published. Above the WHO 2021 guideline of 5 µg/m³; below Serbia's annual limit value of 25 µg/m³ (SEPA report).

SettleMetric computation over Novi Sad climate-normals (WMO 13168) ↗

Curated by SettleMetric

Data as of

Dec 31, 2020

Verified

Nov 3, 2026

Method

Count of months with mean daily max 15–28 °C and precipitation < 150 mm, from the 1991–2020 normals: Apr (18.4 °C), May (23.1), Jun (26.6), Sep (23.9) and Oct (18.3) qualify = 5. Mar (12.7 °C) and Nov (11.5) miss the 15 °C threshold; Jul (28.8 °C, 0.8 above the ceiling) and Aug (29.2) are above 28 °C; no month reaches 150 mm (wettest: Jun 93.0 mm).